10 Comments

New features were good. Well, relative to the rest I mean.

Expand full comment

There was no relatives in this episode

Expand full comment

Relative intit? No, not like Einstein, like comparing on thing to ano- what? Yeah, I know, pointless. But it’s satire intit?

Expand full comment

It’s all pointless, this podcast is the vanguard of it

Expand full comment

Insightful and interesting indeed. Can we have "Ivan's interesting insight"? The eye of an ostrich is bigger than its brain. Same for content creators perhaps.

P.S. Is Guyus Julius Caesar also banned?

Expand full comment

We can have Ians and sometimes Ivan’s Interesting Insight

Expand full comment

Damn that’s an interesting insight, Ivan. The 20+ hours I have invested in this podcast have finally paid off.

Expand full comment

I think "Internet man" is a proper inspirational character in the WACU.

Expand full comment

It’s getting to the point where even I’d struggle to unpack the WACU

Expand full comment

I seem to have been unwillingly tied to this ridiculous podcast now that Craig has added my name to the feature that I suggested *he* do. Dick move Burgess. Dick move.

As I am now duty bound, here is this Wednesdays fact (or ‘insight’ as Craig has decided to mislabel it):

Did you know that the English language has around 900 collective nouns? 

Most were coined in the 15th Century and are beautifully eccentric and odd (like Craig).

Have you ever seen a bloat of hippos, a charm of finches, a barrel of monkeys or a coalition of cheetahs?

Maybe you’ve witnessed a mutation of thrushes, a confusion of warblers, a generation of vipers, a destruction of wild cats or a conspiracy of lemurs?

Don’t question why, just enjoy the madness of the English language.

Please do write in to tell Craig what would make a suitable collective noun for podcasters. Lord knows he needs the c*ntent.

Expand full comment